Identification of Risk Factors for Gliptin-associated Bullous Pemphigoid among Diabetic Patients.

Drug-associated bullous pemphigoid has been shown to follow long-term gliptin (dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors) intake. This study aimed at identifying risk factors for gliptin-associated bullous pemphigoid among patients with type 2 diabetes. A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary centre among diabetic patients exposed to gliptins between the years 2008-2021. Data including demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory results were collected using the MDClone platform. Seventy-six patients with type 2 diabetes treated with dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors who subsequently developed bullous pemphigoid were compared with a cohort of 8,060 diabetic patients exposed to dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors who did not develop bullous pemphigoid. Based on a multivariable analysis adjusted for age and other covariates, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias were significantly more prevalent in patients with bullous pemphigoid (p = 0.0013). Concomitant use of either thiazide or loop diuretics and gliptin therapy was associated with drug-associated bullous pemphigoid (p < 0.0001 for both). While compared with sitagliptin, exposure to linagliptin and vildagliptin were associated with bullous pemphigoid with an odds ratio of 5.68 and 6.61 (p < 0.0001 for both), respectively. These results suggest gliptins should be prescribed with caution to patients with type 2 diabetes with coexisting Alzheimer's and other dementias, or patients receiving long-term use of thiazides and loop diuretics. The use of sitagliptin over linagliptin and vildagliptin should be preferred in these patients.

Proteomic changes related to actin cytoskeleton function in the skin of vildagliptin-treated mice.

BACKGROUND: Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) is a widely used type 2 diabetes medication that is associated with an up-to 10-fold increased risk for the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP), an autoimmune skin disease. The mechanism by which vildagliptin promotes the development of BP remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate effects of vildagliptin treatment on the mouse cutaneous proteome. METHODS: We analyzed the cutaneous proteome of nondiabetic mice treated for 12 weeks with vildagliptin using label-free shotgun mass spectrometry (MS), two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Although vildagliptin treatment did not cause any clinical signs or histological changes in the skin, separate MS and 2D-DIGE analyses revealed altered cutaneous expression of several proteins, many of which were related to actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Altogether 18 proteins were increased and 40 were decreased in the vildagliptin-treated mouse skin. Both methods revealed increased levels of beta-actin and C->U-editing enzyme APOBEC2 in vildagliptin-treated mice. However, elevated levels of a specific moesin variant in vildagliptin-treated animals were only detected with 2D-DIGE. Immunohistochemical staining showed altered cutaneous expression of DPP-4, moesin, and galectin-1. The changed proteins detected by MS and 2D-DIGE were linked to actin cytoskeleton remodeling, transport, cell movement and organelle assembly. CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin treatment alters the cutaneous proteome of nondiabetic mice even without clinical signs in the skin. Cytoskeletal changes in the presence of other triggering factors may provoke a break of immune tolerance and further promote the development of BP.

Two cases of linagliptin-associated bullous pemphigoid resulting in sepsis and endocarditis.

We describe two patients, in their 70s, each presenting to the emergency department, with 6-week histories of progressively developing pruritic bullae. Both individuals had multiple comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes-for which they took linagliptin, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and prosthetic heart valves. Owing to systemic illness and endocarditis secondary to superadded bacterial infections, they both required intensive treatment and prolonged hospital admissions.Despite the beneficial effect of linagliptin on glycaemic control and its reported cardiovascular and renal safety profiles, we add our cases as evidence of the significant risk of developing bullous pemphigoid while taking this medication. Secondary infection of bullous pemphigoid increased the risk of developing endocarditis, particularly among individuals with a medical history of valve replacement surgery. Considering this, we advocate caution when prescribing this medication.

Lichen planus pemphigoides induced by anti-PD-1 antibody: A case only involved in oral mucosa with excellent topical treatment efficiency.

Lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) is a rare autoimmune subepidermal disease that can occur in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Its clinical manifestations are combined with the characteristics of lichen planus with bullous pemphigoid that can occur on either skin or oral mucosa. It should be noted that oral LPP is very rare. Here, we report a novel case of oral LPP induced by an anti-PD-1 agent. The patient presented with typical clinical features in oral mucosa, and the diagnosis was based on histopathology and immunological studies. Given that the patient was receiving an anti-PD-1 agent, topical therapy was chosen, and a nice therapeutic effect was obtained. No significant recurrence was observed after a 2-year follow-up. A good and stable therapeutic effect achieved by rapid and local symptomatic medication suggests that accurate and sensitive diagnosis is necessary.

Gliptin-induced bullous pemphigoid.

OBJECTIVES: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, autoimmune, blistering disease in elderly patients that can be triggered by external factors including drugs. Drug-induced bullous pemphigoid (DIBP) does not always follow a self-limiting course after the withdrawal of the offending drug. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or gliptins seem to be associated with a significant risk of inducing BP. CASE PRESENTATION: We report 2 cases of BP attributed to the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin. In both cases, the clinical manifestation was strongly suggestive of BP. The diagnosis was verified by histology and direct immunofluorescence (DIF). Linagliptin and all other possible drug triggers of BP were discontinued after consultation with an endocrinologist and a cardiologist. Systemic treatment of BP consisted of methylprednisolone and tetracycline. During the follow-up period, one of the patients suffered a fatal brain stroke while the other was managed with reduced doses of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: The proper management of autoimmune bullous skin disorders in elderly patients includes a scrupulous assessment of plausible drug triggers. Systemic corticosteroids for treating severe cases of DIBP can worsen concomitant diseases which often necessitates multidisciplinary care.

From Molecular Insights to Clinical Perspectives in Drug-Associated Bullous Pemphigoid.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common autoimmune blistering disease, is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies targeting BP180 and BP230 in the basement membrane zone. This leads to the activation of complement-dependent and independent pathways, resulting in proteolytic cleavage at the dermoepidermal junction and an eosinophilic inflammatory response. While numerous drugs have been associated with BP in the literature, causality and pathogenic mechanisms remain elusive in most cases. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i), in particular, are the most frequently reported drugs related to BP and, therefore, have been extensively investigated. They can potentially trigger BP through the impaired proteolytic degradation of BP180, combined with immune dysregulation. DPP4i-associated BP can be categorized into true drug-induced BP and drug-triggered BP, with the latter resembling classic BP. Antineoplastic immunotherapy is increasingly associated with BP, with both B and T cells involved. Other drugs, including biologics, diuretics and cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric agents, present weaker evidence and poorly understood pathogenic mechanisms. Further research is needed due to the growing incidence of BP and the increasing identification of new potential triggers.

Case Report: A Presentation of Early-Onset Immune-Mediated Bullous Pemphigoid in a Patient with Urothelial Cancer.

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are the most common side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy (30-50% for all grades). The vast majority of them are low or mild and can be treated without ICI interruption. Autoimmune blistering disorders, such as immune-mediated bullous pemphigoid (IBP), are rare (<1%) but potentially serious conditions that must be early detected. The onset generally occurs within the first months of the treatment, and it appears to be more common with antiprogrammed death-1 or antiprogrammed ligand 1 (anti-PD1/PDL1) than with anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4). We present a case of a three-day severe IBP onset after receiving the first cycle of atezolizumab. This exceptional early presentation could suggest the presence of some predisposing condition and demonstrates the need to better understand predictive toxicity-related biomarkers in candidate patients for immunotherapy.

Clinical characterization, treatment, and outcome of nivolumab-induced bullous pemphigoid.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a serious and rare complication of nivolumab. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of nivolumab-induced BP and provide a reference for prevention and treatment of BP. METHODS: Literature on nivolumab-induced BP was collected for retrospective analysis by searching both Chinese and English databases as of July 31, 2023. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included, with a median age of 71 years (range 30 to 85 years), and they were predominantly male (78.3%). The median time to onset of BP was 31 weeks (range 2.4, 216) after nivolumab administration. Tense bullae (93.3%), pruritus (55.0%), and urticarial plaques (31.7%) were the most common manifestations. Lesions were found on the limbs (50.0%), trunk (38.3%), palms and soles (15.0%). Skin biopsies mainly showed subepidermal bullous/blister (50.0%) and eosinophilic infiltration (46.7%). Direct immunofluorescence showed mainly linear deposition of C3 and IgG (46.7%) at the dermal-epidermal junction. The patients stopped taking nivolumab and received systemic steroids (73.3%), topical steroids (63.3%), monoclonal antibodies (21.7%), doxycycline/minocycline (30.0%) and other treatments. Symptoms improved or were relieved in 88.4% of patients but did not improve in 8.3% of patients. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should closely monitor symptoms of BP in those receiving and discontinuing nivolumab, especially in older men. Early diagnosis and timely initiation of treatment may improve patient outcomes.

A case of herpetiform pemphigus mimicking bullous pemphigoid after using secukinumab and successfully treated with sulfasalazine.

Interleukin 17A (IL-17A) inhibitors, such as secukinumab, have been widely used as the mainstream treatment for chronic plaque psoriasis; however, cutaneous adverse events have been reported. Here, we report a 43-year-old Chinese man who developed herpetiform pemphigus (HP) during secukinumab treatment for his psoriasis. He presented with (1) clinical features of HP, which resembled bullous pemphigoid; histopathological features of intraepidermal blisters, eosinophilic/neutrophilic spongiosis, and liquefactive degeneration of the basal cell layer; (3) positive anti-desmoglein 1 antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and cell surface IgG reactivity within the epidermis by indirect immunofluorescence assay; and (4) a satisfactory response to salicylazosulfapyridine (sulfasalazine). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the development of HP after the use of secukinumab for psoriasis.

Effect of early initiation of steroid-sparing drugs in patients with bullous pemphigoid.

Introduction: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) can be treated using systemic and topical glucocorticoids and/or other immunomodulatory agents. However, the long-term use of systemic glucocorticoids causes severe adverse side effects. This study was aimed at investigating whether the early initiation of corticosteroid-sparing therapy (CST) in BP patients results in better outcomes than late or no CST. Method: We retrospectively identified all BP patients referred to the tertiary center, of the Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, from 2015 to 2021. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, treatment, remission of BP, length of admission, relapse, and 1-year mortality were recorded. All patients who received CST were dichotomised into two groups: initiated with CST <28 or >28 days. The groups were compared using t-tests. Additionally, all patients who received CST were compared with those who received systemic glucocorticoids alone. Our cohort was compared with that of a previous study (2006-2013) performed in our department. In 2015, we revised our BP treatment guidelines to include the early initiation of CST. Results: On comparing the group of patients initiated with CST <28 versus >28 days, we found no significant differences in the complications or mortality between the groups (p = 0.63 and p=0.79, respectively). The <28 days group had a lower rate of relapse (p < 0.05). On comparing data from this study with those from the previous study, conducted before we revised our treatment guideline, we found a reduced initial dose of prednisolone and reduced admission time in this study. No significant differences were found between patients treated with CST and those treated with systemic glucocorticoids alone. Conclusion: The rate of complications and 1-year mortality did not differ significantly between the two subgroups in this study. The relapse rate was lower in the CST <28 days group than in the CST >28 days group. The initial dose of prednisolone and admission time were reduced in this study compared with those in the previous study performed before the implementation of a local treatment guideline recommending the early initiation of CST.

A case of bullous pemphigoid developing under treatment with benralizumab for bronchial asthma.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by itchy erythema and tense blisters on the whole body. Recent reports have unveiled the pathogenic roles of eosinophils in BP (e.g., dermal-epidermal separation, generation of pruritus). Thus, eosinophils are considered a therapeutic target. Benralizumab is an anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (IL-5Rα) monoclonal antibody (mAb) that is widely used to treat severe eosinophilic asthma. By affecting IL-5Rα, benralizumab depletes eosinophils and basophils due to apoptosis through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The efficacies of benralizumab and other biologics, including bertilimumab (anti-eotaxin-1 mAb) and mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 mAb), were evaluated in several clinical trials. Also, reslizumab, an anti-IL-5 mAb, was reported as a successful treatment option in a case of BP. We present a case of severe asthma treated with benralizumab at 8-week intervals for 3 years before BP developed. Histologically, subepidermal blisters without eosinophilic infiltration were observed. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by 40 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day) of oral prednisolone (PSL) was initiated, but the skin lesions worsened. Additional intravenous immunoglobulin and oral azathioprine enabled the oral PSL to be tapered. The benralizumab was discontinued after the onset of BP because the asthma did not worsen. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of BP developing during anti-eosinophil therapy. BP may occur paradoxically via various pathways during treatment with drugs that are typically effective against BP.

Efficacy and safety of biological agents for pemphigoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biologic agents (also termed biologics) have become an important adjuvant-targeted treatment option in autoimmune blistering disease. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of newly licensed biologics for the management of pemphigoid using a meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies involving pemphigoid patients treated with biological agents (rituximab, dupilumab, omalizumab, or mepolizumab) were searched. The pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the short-term efficacy, adverse event (AE), relapse, and long-term survival. A total of seven studies involving 296 patients were identified. The pooled RRs for short-term effectiveness, AE, relapse, and long-term survival rate in patients treated with biological agents versus systemic corticosteroids were 1.37 (95% CI 0.95-1.97; I2 = 82%; P = 0.09), 0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.73; I2 = 13%; P = 0.005), 1.36 (95% CI 0.95-1.96; I2 = 16.8%; P = 0.19), and 1.08 (95% CI 0.95-1.21; I2 = 48.1%; P = 0.53), respectively. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis revealed that the RRs of efficacy were 2.10 (95% CI 1.61-2.75; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001) for rituximab and 2.07 (95% CI 1.61-2.67; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001) for sample size greater than 30. Compared with conventional therapy, biologics treatment was significantly associated with fewer adverse events (P < 0.05), but no significant differences were found for efficacy and relapse (P > 0.05). The findings demonstrate that a biologics-containing regimen could minimize the occurrence of AEs and might display a comparable efficacy and recurrence to that of receiving systemic corticosteroids.